Monday, February 26, 2024
Homeus economyFannie, Freddie bill leaves status of private shareholders to courts

Fannie, Freddie bill leaves status of private shareholders to courts

A draft bill to wind down government-run mortgage financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, released by two leading U.S. senators on Sunday, would leave a decision on how to treat their private shareholders to the courts.

The 442-page draft from the Democratic chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and the panel's top Republican would keep in place current terms of the government's bailout of the two companies that require them to sweep all their profits into the U.S. Treasury.

It is silent on whether or not private shareholders should share in any proceeds when the companies are liquidated.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two leading sources of U.S. mortgage funds, were seized by the government during the financial crisis in 2008 and propped up with $187.5 billion in taxpayer funds. In return, the government got a controlling stake in the companies.

They have since returned to profitability and by the end of March will have sent the Treasury $202.9 billion in dividends.

(Read more: )

Private investors, including Perry Capital and Fairholme Capital Management, have sued over the bailout terms. They argue they should stand to benefit from the profits given that the companies soon will have paid more in dividends to taxpayers than they received in aid.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac help ensure the mortgage market stays liquid by buying loans from lenders and repackaging them as securities that they sell to investors with a guarantee. Since the government seized the firms, that guarantee has explicit government backing.

The bill, written by Democrat Tim Johnson and Republican Mike Crapo, would replace the companies with a new industry-financed agency. The agency would provide a government backstop, but it would only kick in after private creditors took a hit.

(Read more: Efforts to kill Fannie-Freddie may already be dead)

It would aim to shutter the companies over five years, although that deadline could be extended multiple times if a replacement system was not ready.

"This proposal includes an explicit government guarantee in order to add stability to the economy, keep costs reasonable for borrowers and renters, and ensure fair access to the secondary market for all lenders," said Johnson.

RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -

Most Popular