Note to Staff
Re: Our Malaysian Airline coverage
People tend to root for an interesting story — the Hollywood version — rather than a boring truth.
We're seeing that to a degree with the Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 story. As the mystery grows, more and more theories abound about its disappearance. Some are outlandish (aliens and meteorites) while others are sinister (terrorists and Snowden). And then there are the more straightforward: mechanical failure, fire, weather, etc.
In the journalism business, we should concentrate just as much, indeed even more, on the latter than the former, especially since the flight had 239 souls on board. The explanation of their fate should not be viewed as entertainment, even if tales of plots and intrigue make for a better story.
Nevertheless, the world seems more interested in a good story.
This was evident yesterday when Wired reposted a socially published piece from a seemingly qualified aviation professional offering a fairly simple explanation for the flight's disappearance, electrical fire, that could cover most of the weird events documented to date. The Internet, being the Internet, was quick to pounce, poking holes and hurling invective.
Of course, very few of the folks doing the disparaging of the piece appeared to have actually read it all the way through. Some of the points they raised were already addressed in the original piece. (Though, people not reading through on the Internet is hardly surprising.)